Replacing Hazelwood coal-fired power station – Critique of Environment Victoria report

Guest Post by Peter Lang. Peter is a retired geologist and engineer with 40 years experience on a wide range of energy projects throughout the world, including managing energy R&D and providing policy advice for government and opposition. His experience includes: coal, oil, gas, hydro, geothermal, nuclear power plants, nuclear waste disposal, and a wide […]

Trawling for snake oil

A new guest post by Geoff Russell — only mildly climate-change related, but definitely ‘food for thought’ in the context of sustainability of natural resources (and bad science)… ——————————————————————- The last couple of weeks have seen a few things tickle my particular itch … the linkages between nutrition, food security and climate change. The first is a […]

TCASE 10: Not all capacity factors are made equal

As I noted in a recent post, my new goal with TCASE posts is for them to be shorter, more targeted and more regular, with the aim being to break big problems in sustainable energy down into very focused questions (each of the new TCASE posts will be a maximum of 1,000 words — my […]

Counterpoint ABC radio debate – Does being green mean going nuclear?

The Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) has now broadcast my debate with Ian Lowe over nuclear power, on Radio National’s Counterpoint program. The discussion lasts 50 minutes, and includes various questions and answers from the Why vs Why: Nuclear Power book, moderated by Paul Comrie-Thompson. We cover issues of waste management, weapons proliferation, adequacy of renewable energy alternatives, […]

Learning the truth about energy

I note that the scalability and cost of solar thermal technologies, and it viability compared to nuclear power, has been a hot topic on the BNC comments forum (see especially here and here). While it is good to see this sort of ongoing discussion, I’d like to take a brief moment to offer a couple […]

Pamphlets, talks and tweets on nuclear power and climate change

This is an update on some recent media I’ve been doing — and will be presenting in the near future — on nuclear power and climate change. I’d also like to recommend some excellent pamphlets I’ve just read. ——————————- I’ve completed the first round of media promotion of my new co-authored book, Why vs Why: […]

Venus syndrome – the Claron’s despair

I’ve read deeply on Earth history over the last 30 years of my life — both for personal interest, and as an underpinning of my research and teaching. I first got into science because I wanted to be a palaeontologist (a specialist on past life and evolution in deep time), an interest that traces its […]

Open Thread 4

Time for a new Open Thread (the last one has more than 500 comments and is about to spool off the end of the BNC frontpage). The Open Thread is a general discussion forum, where you can talk about whatever you like — there is nothing ‘off topic’ here — within reason. So get up […]

An informed public is key to acceptance of nuclear energy

Guest post by DV82XL. He is a Canadian chemist and materials scientist (and regular, valued commenter on BNC). For his previous article on the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit, see here. Governments are coming to recognize nuclear power as an attractive option because of its near absence of carbon dioxide emissions and the widespread availability of uranium which […]

Why vs Why: Nuclear Power – new book by BNC author

Below is a media release for my new book, which will hit book stores on Monday (3 May), retailing at $19.99: Brook, B.W. & Lowe, I. (2010) Why vs Why: Nuclear Power. Pantera Press, Sydney. ISBN 978-0-9807418-5-8. I wrote the “Yes” case (sneak peak at an extract, here). The co-author, who wrote the “No” case, […]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,798 other followers