New BNC podcast series and predict millionth page view

One of the new initiatives I’ll be trying in 2011 is an audio podcast series (I use the term ‘series’ loosely, as there’ll be no fixed schedule). This is now fairly straightforward to do, via my iPhone 4 and the Audioboo app.

This type of media/blogging is quick and flexible to do on the fly. This is a real advantage for me, because I quite often have time to take 5-10 minutes to record something, but often not time to compose a more detailed blog post (once every 3-5 days is about my sanity limit!). So, in this way, I hope to add a lot of detailed content on very specific topics by this method.

All of the podcasts will be short (<5 minutes) and will range from general observations of recent news in climate and energy, to very targeted answers to questions (please feel free to pose those you’d like me to have a go at answering), to short interviews with interesting people.

To access the podcasts, you could: (a) click on the purple Audioboo icon left sidebar of the BNC homepage (this will take you to the BNC Podcast site) or (b) subscribe to BNC’s Boo RSS audio feed or subscribe to the iTunes feed (same link as the RSS but replace “http” with “itpc“) to have it automatically delivered to your iPhone, iPad or iPod. Note that it is also automatically announced on my Twitter feed and Facebook page.

To kick things off, I’ve put up a couple of launch recordings:

Welcome to BraveNewClimate (4:27 min)

Integral Fast Reactor nuclear power – what is it and why should you care? (2:45 min)

Are the climate and energy debates missing the point? (4:56 min)

At least initially, this will be very much an ad hoc affair, but I hope it proves useful and interesting. More formally, I’m hoping to also set up a more professionally hosted podcast series, which will run weekly or fortnightly for 15-30 min — I’ve done some brainstorming about this with some key people, but am yet to finalise any details, so stay tuned.

Talking of public broadcasts, I’ll be doing an extended interview with ABC Counterpoint soon on the Energy paper. I’ll also be doing a session with ABC 891 mornings programme (Matt & Dave) on floods and climate change, which for Adelaide viewers, will be on at about 8:30am (note also that the Bureau of Meteorology has updated their special climate statement on this, to cover the extraordinary January conditions in QLD and Vic).

(more…)

Twitter Plimer on ice

Okay, so the title of this blog post is rather cryptic, but that’s because I want to quickly talk about three different things. Twittering BNC. Brook v Plimer report back. And the famous disappearing Arctic sea ice.

First then, BraveNewClimate is now producing tweets. You can start following here: http://twitter.com/BraveNewClimate. I’ve also fed the latest 5 tweets on the right sidebar of the BNC blog, below the recent comments list. I’ll use this to feed snippets of interesting information or news that I’ve come across, which relates to the theme of BNC (climate change science and impacts, and sustainable energy for the world), as well as sending out announcements of new blog entries. Feel free to become a Twitter BNC follower, if this part of Web 2.0 takes your fancy.

Second, a brief reflection on that debate with Ian Plimer. It was an interesting night out, which I mostly enjoyed, though it admittedly did fell a bit like a Circus act. The audience turnout was certainly fantastic — a small hall in North Adelaide was packed to the hilt, which made for a great atmosphere. Ian Henschke from ABC Stateline made for a good, fair moderator.

I focused initially on communicating the methods of science and how many small elements come together in a vast body of knowledge that is the science of climate change and its impacts. Plimer then spoke for 10 minutes on the need to consider time (I’d pre-empted him on this), and stated that climate is ‘always changing’ and that the theory that carbon dioxide is causing current change, or has ever caused it, has been falsified. I’ve addressed why this is not the case many times before, and in my rebuttal I made mostly the same points again.

The question and answer session that followed was fairly routine, except for a rather dramatic ‘moment’ involving a poorly phrased  audience question that invoked a sharp retort from my opponent (you had to be there), and some less-than-gentle prodding of Ian by me in order to extract a clear on the question of water vapour’s contribution to the greenhouse effect — which resulted in Ian demanding intervention from the moderator. I’ll leave it to the audience to judge who was in the right. Perhaps some folks who were at the debate can provide their own perspective in the comments below — I know Geoff Russell and ‘John Smith’ already have, in the previous thread.

(more…)

CCQA6 Presentations Available

The PowerPoint presentations from the 6th and final seminar in the Climate Change Q and A series are now available as PDF files. The presentation by Professor Barry Brook considers whether greenhouse denial represents a coherent alternative to mainstream science while the presentation by Dr Michael Lardelli focusses on peak oil. Please see at bravenewclimate.com or adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for details.

If you believe copyrighted work is available on this site in such a way that constitutes copyright infringement, or a breach of an agreed licence or contract, please let us know.

3/3 CCQA6 Questions from the audience regarding peak oil and greenhouse denial vs good science

Listen to Barry Brook and Michael Lardelli respond to questions from the audience at the 6th and final seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

Please note this recording contains brief silent sections where audience members asking questions did not have a microphone. You can use the fast-forward function on your media player to skip these sections.

2/3 CCQA6 Barry Brook on greenhouse denial versus good science

Listen to Prof Barry Brook’s presentation on the claim of discord in the scientific community and whether climate change denial represents a coherent alternative to mainstream science. This is the 2nd of 3 recordings from the 6th and final seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

1/3 CCQA6 Intro and Michael Lardelli on peak oil

Listen to the seminar introduction by Barry Brook and the presentation by Dr Michael Lardelli focussing on peak oil. This is the 1st of 3 recordings from the 6th and final seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

Climate Change Q and A Seminar 6: Friday 24 Oct – The popular media debate on climate change and peak oil

Seminar reminder and Discussion Thread.

Friday 24 October: Greenhouse denial versus good science: The ‘pretend debate”

“Even the scientists don’t agree.”

Perfect agreement is hard to achieve, particularly on subjects as complex and expansive as climate change. However, a vast majority of scientists do agree that human activity is causing global climate change, that the consequences will be negative and far reaching and that urgent action must be taken. Yet, there are those who claim there is no evidence, no consensus, no proof. Others say scientists are ‘alarmist,’ or that there is a scientific conspiracy.

This final seminar focuses on the claim of discord in the scientific community, and whether climate change denial really represents a coherent alternative theory to mainstream science.

The guest speaker will talk of another critical, yet poorly addressed resource crisis – peak oil.

An extended question-and-answer period will be included in this final seminar of the series.

(more…)

3/4 CCQA5 Barry Brook on the economic costs of climate change

Listen to Prof Barry Brook address the question: “Will it cost the earth to avoid climate change?” This is the 3rd of 4 recordings from the 5th seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series. Note: Additional recordings from this series may be posted at a later date.

2/4 CCQA5 Davide Ross on carbon abatement

Listen to Dr Davide Ross’ presentation on carbon abatement given from a business and economic perspective. This is the 2nd of 4 recordings from the 5th seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series. Note: Additional recordings from seminar 5 may be posted at a later date.

Climate Change Q and A Seminar 5: Friday 10 Oct – Will it cost the earth to avoid climate change?

Seminar reminder and Discussion Thread.

Friday 10 October: Will it cost the earth to avoid climate change?

“Mitigating carbon emissions will ruin the economy!”

A host of wait-and-see stalling techniques have arisen out of fear that taking decisive action now to reduce emissions will throw us into an economic depression or back to the stone age. We, in Australia, point the finger, asking why we should take action when other countries aren’t. We also imagine that fossil fuel supplies are so vast that we will never run out of them, at least not for many centuries.

Viable solutions remain under-developed in lieu of debates about population being the “real” problem, carbon offsets being unfeasible, renewable energy being too limited, carbon capture-and-storage being unworkable, and peak oil or other resource crunches being a myth. We look to some future technology or geo-engineering solution saving the day.

This seminar looks at what approaches are available to us now, what energy futures are possible, and how much they will really cost us to implement.

(more…)

3/3 CCQA4 Questions from the audience regarding the impacts of climate change

Listen to Barry Brook and Corey Bradshaw respond to questions from the audience at the 4th seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

Please note this recording has some silent periods because of questions asked without a microphone. Efforts have been made reduce this effect and enhance ease of listening.

2/3 CCQA4 Barry Brook on the impacts of climate change

Listen to Prof Barry Brook’s presentation on the impacts of climate change. This is the 2nd of 3 recordings from the 4th seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

1/3 CCQA4 Intro and Corey Bradshaw on marine impacts

Listen to the seminar introduction by Barry Brook and the presentation by Associate Professor Corey Bradshaw focussing on the impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems. This is the 1st of 3 recordings from the 4th seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

Climate Change Q and A Seminar 4: Friday 19 Sept – Are the impacts of climate change being overstated?

Seminar reminder and Discussion Thread.

Friday 19 September: What future climate change scenarios are possible?

“Global warming is good, agriculture will flourish!”

Such statements represent the tip of an iceberg of arguments suggesting that global warming isn’t going to have catastrophic impacts. Some of these are based on pseudo science regarding the effects of global warming on severe weather, sea level rise, or the loss of glaciers. Others focus on the possibility of a few winners in our gamble with the climate–those who find the changes favorable or who are better positioned to adapt–while neglecting the fact there will be a far greater number of people, plants and animals who will suffer as a result of the unnaturally rapid change that are to come.

So what does 2°, 3° or even 6°C of global warming really mean? Find out in the fourth seminar of this series.

(more…)

3/3 CCQA3 Questions from the audience regarding climate models and projections

Listen to Barry Brook and Peter Hayman respond to questions from the audience at the 3rd seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

Please note this recording contains brief silent sections where audience members asking questions did not have a microphone. In general, the presenter repeats the question before giving his answer.

2/3 CCQA3 Barry Brook on climate models and projections

Listen to Prof Barry Brook’s presentation on climate models and projections. This is the 2nd of 3 recordings from the 3rd seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

1/3 CCQA3 Intro and Peter Hayman on climate variability and impacts

Listen to the seminar introduction by Barry Brook and the presentation by Dr Peter Hayman focussing on climate variability and its associated impacts, especially on South Australia. This is the 1st of 3 recordings from the 3rd seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

3/3 CCQA2 Questions from the audience regarding climate change causes

Listen to Barry Brook respond to questions from the audience at the 2nd seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

Please note this recording contains some silent sections where audience members asking questions did not have a microphone. Please fast forward through these sections. The recording ends when you hear the applause.

2/3 CCQA2 Barry Brook on human vs natural climate change

Listen to Prof Barry Brook explain the science showing that current climate changes are attributable to human activities. This is the 2nd of 3 recordings from the 2nd seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

1/3 CCQA2 Intro and Bob Hill on natural climate changes

Listen to the seminar introduction by Barry Brook and the presentation by Prof Bob Hill focussing on how we can distinguish between natural and human-induced climate change. This is the 1st of 3 recordings from the 2nd seminar in the series entitled Climate Change Q and A: Sceptical Questions and the Scientific Answers. Subscribe for podcasts at bravenewclimate.com/feed or go to adelaide.edu.au/climatechange for complete details about the series.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,620 other followers

%d bloggers like this: